Kyle Busch wins another NASCAR Truck race, this time at Charlotte

1 Comment

Last week. The track was Kansas Speedway. The top three trucks were 51-88-19.

Friday night. The track was Charlotte Motor Speedway. The top three trucks were 51-88-19.

The result? Nearly identical.

Kyle Busch won his second straight NASCAR Camping World Truck Series race this evening in the No. 51 Hire Our Heroes/Toyota Care Toyota, from Matt Crafton and the No. 19 Brad Keselowski Racing Ford driven by BK himself.

The win is Busch’s 38th overall, and fourth in his last four starts dating to 2013 (three-for-three this year) in the Truck Series.

The only difference from the top three last week was that Joey Logano drove the No. 19 BKR Ford in Kansas. These were also the top three starters in Friday night’s race.

For Busch, this Friday night was yet another crushing tour de force, his 19th win on a 1.5-mile track and his fourth straight in a truck at Charlotte. He led 130 of 134 laps.

“This thing was stout, it showed in qualifying, and showed in the race,” Busch said in victory lane. “It was a fun race for us. We had a dominant beast, especially on the long runs. It seemed like in traffic, I didn’t lose as much as other guys. There’s no secrets (to restarts) – the biggest thing was just timing. You play those games, and see them happening. I try not to do that do often.”

Crafton was second, the fifth time he’s finished second to Busch in the trucks.

“I’m gonna have to whoop him in some way. I’m getting tired of it,” Crafton joked post-race. “We struggled a bit on pit road, although we got back some track position. The last five laps it just went away, but overall not a bad run.”

With his third top five finish of the season, Crafton is the points leader by 11 points over Timothy Peters.

Said Keselowski, who finished third: “I was wishing for a caution, just not all the ones with 25-30 to go. We were trying to snooker Kyle but didn’t get the chance. It wasn’t meant to be. We are trying to find a little bit more speed to run with the 51.”

Behind the top three, John Wes Townley finished a career-best fourth, although his night was marred by a moment of contact where he attempted to thread the needle between Keselowski’s teammate Ryan Blaney and Brian Ickler in the tri-oval. Peters finished fifth.

On Lap 105, Townley pitched Blaney, whose truck took off when it hit the grass at the second apex of the tri-oval, then slid up the road into Ickler who had nowhere to go.

Said Blaney of JWT, “(Expletive) happens. I don’t know what he was thinking.”

The Blaney-Ickler accident was one of several over the course of the races, which was interrupted by nine cautions for 47 laps.

The series resumes at Dover in two weeks, on Friday, May 30.

Neurosurgeon discusses brain injuries such as Michael Schumacher’s

Getty Images
1 Comment

PARIS (AP) — More than four years after a ski accident caused him a near-fatal brain injury, little is known about Michael Schumacher’s current condition. Updates on his health have been extremely scarce ever since he left hospital in September 2014 to be cared for privately at his Swiss home on the shores of Lake Geneva. Details of his specific condition and the treatment he received have been kept strictly private. The last public statement 16 months ago clarified nothing further would be said.

Colin Shieff is a retired neurosurgeon from Britain’s National Health Service and a trustee of Headway, the national brain injury charity. Although he has never treated Schumacher, or spoken with doctors who’ve treated Schumacher over the years, he has dealt with similar cases both at immediate critical-care level and further down the line in terms of long-term treatment.

Shieff spent many years working with people with brain injuries and trauma, including at NATO field hospitals in Afghanistan an Iraq. He answered questions for The Associated Press related to the nature of Schumacher’s brain injury, pertaining to how his condition may have evolved in the time since his accident.

MORE: As F1 season begins, Michael Schumacher still fighting, far from forgotten

Q. In your opinion, what’s the likely prognosis at this stage?

A. “The nature of his injury and those bits of information that are available, and have been available, suggest that he has sustained permanent and very major damage to his brain. As a consequence his brain does not function in a fashion similar to yours or mine. The longer one goes on after an injury the more remote it is that any improvement becomes. He is almost certainly not going to change from the situation he is now.”

Q. What ongoing treatments would he be having?

A. “He will have the kind of treatment, which is care: giving him nourishment, giving him fluid. The probability is that this is given in the main – or at least as supplements – through some tube passed into his intestinal system, either through his nose or mouth, or more likely a tube in the front wall of the tummy. He will have therapy to sit him, because he won’t be able to get himself out of a bed and into a chair. He will be treated in a way that will ensure his limbs move and don’t remain rigid.”

Q. Would someone in his position receive around-the-clock treatment?

A. “He will be allowed a period of rest and sleep and relaxation, and he will be given an environment. I’m positive as I can be without knowing the facts (that) he will be living in an environment that – although it’s got artificial bits of medical kit and care and people – will mimic a caring, warm, pleasant, socially stimulating environment.”

Q. Would he be able to sense he’s in such an environment?

A. “I don’t know. There is always a technical, medical and neurological issue with defining a coma. Almost certainly he cannot express himself (in a conversation). He may well be able to indicate, or it may be apparent to those around him, that he is uncomfortable or unhappy. Or (he) is perhaps getting pleasure from seeing his children or hearing music he’s always liked, or having his hand stroked.”

Q. Are patients in his situation aware of touch and voice from family members?

A. “Absolutely. Even in the early stages, even in a critical care unit, when medicines are being given, for one individual at one time there may be an ability to discern and show response to someone they are familiar with. Respond to familiar, respond to family you’re triggered to. You hear them all your life so that’s the very, very familiar (aspect) the person is going to respond to.”

Q. Is there a chance he can make A) a full recovery? B) A partial recovery?

A. “First one, absolutely, totally no. Number one statistically, number two neurologically, and number three he’s been ill for so long. He’s lost muscle bulk, even if he opened his eyes and started talking there will have been loss of memory, there will be impact on behavior, on cognitive functions. He would not be the same person. (As for a) partial recovery, even the smallest thing that gets better is some kind of recovery. But (it depends) whether that recovery contributes to a functional improvement for him to be able to express himself – other than an evidence of saying `Yes’ or an evidence of saying `No.’ (Therefore) if he could use words of two syllables, if he could turn on the remote control for the tele. One can do, professionally, all sorts of wonderful things with electronic devices and couple them up to eye and mouth movements. Sometimes with a person in a situation called `Locked In’ or `Profoundly neurologically comprised’ – which is essentially paralysis but with continuing intellectual function – ways can be found to communicate with those people. If that had been so with Michael Schumacher I am positive we would have known that is the case, so I don’t believe it’s so for him.”

Q. This is a deeply personal decision for the family. But how long can treatment last for?

A. “In, for example, our health system we don’t have the luxury to keep maximal intervention going in a high-tech hospital environment. For Michael Schumacher’s family, I suspect they have the financial support to be able to provide those things. Therefore, for him, the future is longer but it doesn’t imply any change in the quality of it.”

Q. Some reports have estimated the cost of treatment at anything up to 200,000 euros ($245,000) per week. Is that realistic?

A. “I would personally think that’s over the top, in terms of what I reckon that might buy him. He’ll have a nurse, a therapist, a visiting doctor. There’ll be an extra pair of hands when something physical is being done, when he’s being moved to somewhere. That doesn’t add up to 150,000 euros or 200,000 euros. He needs essentially, somebody with nursing or therapeutic qualifications with him at all times. So that’s however many people you need to run a 24/7 roster. You’re talking probably eight people to provide that level of care constantly over a year’s period. That’s the number of nurses required for instance, to nurse or to staff, one critical care bed in an intensive care unit.”

More AP auto racing:


For further details on Headway: