Formula 1 needs to learn from Caterham’s story

9 Comments

When Tony Fernandes closed his Twitter account earlier this week with the message “F1 hasn’t worked”, he managed to sum up the sorry state of the sport’s cost crusade in less than 140 characters.

Caterham’s demise has been hard to watch. The team has fought tooth and nail to stay ahead of Marussia, and has been the leading backmarker team for most of its five years in the sport. Last year, it was behind the Anglo-Russian team for just four races – sadly for Caterham, it was enough time for Jules Bianchi to rack up a 13th place finish that would secure Marussia P10 in the constructors’.

For 2014 though, there was renewed hope. In Kamui Kobayashi, the team had secured a very popular and talented driver; you can expect the Suzuka grandstands to be a sea of green in October. The stars seemed to be aligning for the minnows to make the step forwards and perhaps even score some points.

So when one of the new teams did score points, it was something of a surprise that Marussia had that honor. The teams had been largely neck and neck, but some more brilliance from Bianchi meant that he finished ninth. On the same day, Marcus Ericsson matched Caterham’s best ever result in 11th, but few smiles were raised.

The future for the team is not clear, but buyers are lining up to take over from Fernandes, meaning that it should at least run to the end of the season before perhaps being rebranded.

“F1 hasn’t worked” – for Fernandes, no, it has not. Formula 1 on a budget is always difficult, if not impossible.

But Fernandes did not come into the same sport that we have now. Following the withdrawals of Honda (2008), BMW and Toyota (both 2009), new teams were needed to take the grid back up to a healthy number. After receiving a number of entries, berths were given to Lotus Racing (now Caterham), Virgin (now Marussia) and Campos Meta (then HRT, now defunct).

For all three entrants, the big condition for them joining the party was that a cost cap would come into force, allowing them to run on a budget of around $50m per season. Toyota was spending close to nine times that figure during its time in F1.

At the time, it seemed to be the only way to save F1 from itself. Red Bull’s Christian Horner was enthusiastic, saying: “I think Formula 1 has reacted responsibly. It’s positive to see new teams entered for next year which would have been impossible, I think, without the resource restrictions that will be introduced.”

So when the cost cutting measures were not enforced as strictly as planned, it hit the new teams hard. The fact that they managed to keep gradually cutting the gap to the leading teams despite running on far smaller budgets is highly commendable.

F1’s outlook has changed. At the time of Caterham’s entry, it had the feeling of an “all for one, one for all” club. FOTA, the teams’ association, was doing some great work. However, it sadly became impotent as a political body, and eventually folded earlier this year. The voice for the teams now is the F1 Strategy Group, which only includes the bigger players in the sport. Caterham and company have little to no say in the future of F1 at the moment. The big boys have formed their own club now.

The sport needs to learn from Caterham’s story, but it is unlikely that it will. Teams have come and gone in the past (Super Aguri, Prost, Arrows etc), but that was in a different time when it was a case of spending what you want to be successful. Caterham came in on the provision that things would change, but it has not.

We’re back to 2010. Cost cutting talks continue, but little is actually done. The sport plays host to some of the finest minds in the world, yet they continue to squabble like children and come to few actual solutions. Tony Fernandes’ views and approach was refreshing, just as Monisha Kaltenborn and Bob Fernley are at Sauber and Force India. They are voices of reason.

F1 has managed to reduce five years of struggling and fighting the good fight to less than 140 characters. It is likely that the stories and fall-out from the impending sale of the team will be a bit more drawn out.

Starting lineup grid for IMSA Petit Le Mans: Tom Blomqvist puts MSR on pole position

Petit Le Mans lineup
IMSA
0 Comments

IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar championship contender Tom Blomqvist put the Meyer Shank Racing Acura at the front of the starting lineup for the Motul Petit Le Mans at Michelin Road Atlanta.

Blomqvist turned a 1-minute, 8.55-second lap on the 2.54-mile circuit Friday to capture his third pole position for MSR this season. Earl Bamber qualified second in the No. 02 Cadillac for Chip Ganassi Racing.

Ricky Taylor was third in the No. 10 Acura of Wayne Taylor Racing, which enters Saturday’s season finale with a 19-point lead over the No. 60 of Blomqvist and Oliver Jarvis (who will be joined by Helio Castroneves) for the 10-hour race.

PETIT LE MANS STARTING GRID: Click here for the starting lineup l Lineup by car number

PETIT LE MANS: Info on how to watch

With the pole, MSR sliced the deficit to 14 points behind WTR, which will field the trio of Taylor, Filipe Albuquerque and Brendon Hartley in Saturday’s race.

“We really needed to put the car in this kind of position,” Blomqvist said. “It makes our life a little less stressful tomorrow. It would have given the No. 10 a bit more breathing space. It’s going to be a proper dogfight tomorrow. The guys gave me such a great car. It’s been fantastic this week so far, and it really came alive. I’m hugely thankful to the boys and girls at MSR for giving me the wagon today to execute my job.

“That was a big effort from me. I knew how important it was. It’s just awesome for the guys to give them some sort of reward as well. It’s always nice to be quick. If you do the pole, you know you’ve got a quick car.”

Though WTR has a series-leading four victories with the No. 10, MSR won the Rolex 24 at Daytona and has five runner-up finishes along with its three poles.

The strong performances of the ARX-05s ensure that an Acura will win the final championship in IMSA’s premier Daytona Prototype international (DPi) division, which is being rebranded as Grand Touring Prototype in the move to LMDh cars next season.

Taylor qualified third despite sliding into the Turn 5 gravel during the closing minutes of qualifying while pushing to gain points.

“Qualifying was important for points,” Taylor said. “Going into it, if we outqualified the No. 60 Meyer Shank Acura, they had a lot to lose in terms of championship points. So, we were trying to increase the gap over 20 points which would’ve made a big difference for tomorrow. We would have loved to get the pole and qualify ahead of the No. 60, but in the scheme of the points, it didn’t change a whole lot. I’m feeling good since it’s such a long race, and the No. 10 Konica Minolta Acura team does such a good job strategizing and putting us in a good position.

“I’m very confident in our lineup and our team compared to them over the course of 10 hours. I’d put my two teammates up against those guys any day. I think we are all feeling optimistic and strong for tomorrow.”

In other divisions, PR1 Mathiasen Motorsports (LMP2), Riley Motorsports (LMP3), VasserSullivan (GTD Pro) and Paul Miller Racing (GTD) captured pole positions.

The broadcast of the 10-hour race will begin Saturday at 12:10 p.m. ET on NBC, moving at 3 p.m. to USA Network.


QUALIFYING

Results

Results by class

Fastest lap by driver

Fastest lap by driver after qualifying

Fastest lap by driver and class after qualifying

Fastest lap sequence in qualifying

Best sector times in qualifying

Time cards in qualifying

PRACTICE RESULTS: Session I l Session II l Session III