Even just as a threat, idea to drop Monza continues Italy’s recent F1 plight

9 Comments

Yes, the FIA is based in France, and the origins of Formula One date to the first World Championship Grand Prix in England, but Italy has been as much a part of the fabric of Formula One as any other country in its 60-plus year history.

And quite honestly, I’m getting a bit sick of it getting treated like a redheaded stepchild instead of the valued country that has brought so much to F1’s lore.

News this morning that Bernie Ecclestone is planning to drop Monza from the F1 calendar after 2016 – hell, even the thought of him dropping Monza from the calendar – just makes my blood boil.

It’s akin to Bud Selig signing off his tenure as Major League Baseball Commissioner and saying MLB should drop Wrigley Field and/or Fenway Park in pursuit of some podunk new stadium in North Dakota or something. Or Roger Goodell lowering the boom on Lambeau Field and saying the National Football League is relocating the Green Bay Packers to Abu Dhabi, in the name of international expansion.

There’s four tracks that stand out more than any other on the modern-day calendar as historic venues: Monaco, Silverstone, Spa and Monza. Nurburgring, Montreal and Suzuka also are favorites, but they’re not staples going back to the beginning in 1950.

Monza has been the scene of so much fever – something that can’t be measured by dollars or commercial value.

Does Niki Lauda’s incredible comeback after his near-death accident at the Nurburgring in 1976 carry the same lore if it wasn’t on Ferrari’s home soil? Or does it even happen if Monza didn’t provide the perfect return? I doubt it.

Does the 1-2 for Ferrari in the 1988 Italian Grand Prix rank as one of the all-time great victories for the brand since it broke McLaren’s perfect season if it occurs at Estoril or Jerez, for instance? Hardly.

Does Michael Schumacher’s first Monza win for Ferrari in 1996 inspire the passion of the tifosi to think that after nearly 20 years in the doldrums, they actually were on the verge of an incredible run if it happened elsewhere? Again, unlikely.

These are but three iconic moments from this iconic circuit – a temple of speed where the level of fans’ volume matches the level of the cars (this year, they might exceed it for all we know).

The flood of fans onto the circuit post-race is one of the remaining links to a bygone era, and so refreshing to watch.

The loss of Monza – however presumptive – would be yet another blow to Italy’s current standing in modern day Formula One.

We’d basically be down to Ferrari and Scuderia Toro Rosso, and with no disrespect to STR, it’s hard to feel the same passion about them as a brand since they’re essentially the Red Bull junior team that its perennial underdog, Faenza-based predecessor, Minardi, brought about for 20+ years.

We haven’t had an Italian driver on the grid since 2011. Jarno Trulli and Giancarlo Fisichella were both Grand Prix winners, but never able to reach stratospheric heights in the sport.

We’ve lost an entire generation of potential Italian F1 stars – Giorgio Pantano, Luca Filippi and likely Davide Valsecchi, the Lotus reserve passed over last fall – who didn’t have the budget or the timing needed to enter or stay in Formula One. Pantano’s 2004 season with Jordan didn’t accurately reflect his ability level; Filippi and Valsecchi, both GP2 stars, never got the chance.

Now, the mere thought of losing this circuit – one which still stirs the soul whenever the F1 fraternity heads there – just seems like another idea where potential dollars are trumping passion and history.

You can’t put a price tag on that.

New study surveys drivers’ opinions on crashes, concussions, more

James Black/IndyCar
Leave a comment

Auto racing safety has continued to improve through the decades, but the sport remains inherently dangerous, according to a new survey.

At the close of 2018, a new organization called Racing Safety United emerged with the intention of reducing drivers’ risk of being harmed.

RSU is made up of more than 30 members including former NASCAR Cup Series competitor Jerry Nadeau, two-time NASCAR Xfinity Series champion Randy LaJoie, NHRA team owner Don Schumacher and motorsports journalist Dick Berggren.

One of RSU’s first initiatives was to determine what current drivers thought of racing safety. The organization developed a 14-question survey and promoted it on select motorsports websites and forums. 

Participants were given the opportunity to disclose their identity or remain anonymous, and those who provided contact information were entered to win a $500 prize (for anonymous participants, the prize funds would be donated to a motorsports charity). 

More than 140 individuals participated in the survey over the course of 12 months. Below are the results of the survey:

Driver status

The vast majority of survey participants (60%) were amateur racers, while 26% of the participants were classified as Semi-Pro/Professional racers. The remaining 14% consisted of other individuals involved in the sport such as team owners and crew chiefs. 

When asked how frequently they race, 58% of driver respondents averaged 10 or more times per year on track, while 42% averaged 10 times or less.

The top five tracks respondents said they raced most often: Road Atlanta (21 votes), Watkins Glen (17 votes), Virginia International Raceway (16 votes), Mid-Ohio (16 votes), and Road America (13 votes).

Vehicular damage, injuries common

Over a third of respondents said they had been injured while racing, and almost two-thirds sasid they had suffered severe vehicle damage while racing

Driver error was cited as the top cause of vehicle damage (42 mentions), followed by concrete walls (26 mentions), mechanical failures (24 mentions), and other drivers (19 mentions). The study concluded those results indicated a need for better driver training/coaching, energy absorbing walls, and more technical inspections.

Almost a quarter of drivers said they had experienced racing-related concussions, and nearly half the respondents said one or multiple concussions would affect their decision to race in the future. 

Drivers primarily influenced by peers 

Roughly half the drivers said they would consider adopting new safety equipment if influenced by another driver (51 total mentions) and/or if recommended by a sanctioning body (47 total mentions). The study concluded those results indicated a need for drivers to become safety advocates and educate other drivers and for sanctioning bodies to mandate safety equipment. 

Drivers concerned with concrete walls

Approximately three-quarters of the drivers surveyed said they believed certain race tracks were more dangerous than others. Nearly half the drivers surveyed believe that concrete walls were the primary cause of damage to drivers and vehicles. 

Drivers willing to help

Just more than three-quarters of the drivers surveyed said that they would be willing to join a safety alliance to advocate for safer tracks. Two-thirds of drivers said that they also would be willing to contribute to a motorsports safety fund.

Click here for the full results of RSU’s survey

Follow Michael Eubanks on Twitter