“Focus” light on IndyCar content, but oozes enough cool to enhance “cool factor”


MILWAUKEE – One of the major projects for the Verizon IndyCar Series’ marketing and PR departments this winter has been to push out a series of nationwide premieres of the Warner Bros. Pictures new movie “Focus,” starring Will Smith and Margot Robbie.

It’s been a big task to get the premieres launched in most of the IndyCar race markets – Indianapolis, Detroit and here in Milwaukee to name a few – not to mention the major premiere in Los Angeles last week.

While IndyCar is a part of the movie, it’s only a small part.

I had the opportunity to take in the premiere here Friday night at the Marcus Majestic Cinema with Jack Hawksworth, now driver of the No. 41 ABC Supply Co. Honda for A.J. Foyt Racing, and two members of the IndyCar and Andretti Sports Marketing staff.

When the first IndyCar segment came up about 45 or 50 minutes into the movie, we all exchanged quizzical looks.

The standard turbocharged V6 engines that Chevrolet and Honda make were over-dubbed with portions of either V8 or V10 era Formula 1 engines, with no consistency.

The V6s were heard idling a bit later, but that was definitely a “secondary sound” compared to the screams of V8s and V10s you heard earlier.

Again, it would only be racing insiders/fans/geeks that would pick up on this, but it’s an important element to note.

The other racing element of the film is that Smith’s character, a veteran con man, is working his angle on what appears to be an Argentine businessman while also dealing with an Australian when at the track (NOLA Motorsports Park, where the IndyCar portions were filmed). We never got the South American character’s native country, but as that portion of the film is supposed to be taking place in Buenos Aires, you can make that deduction.

With that being said, you can look at the IndyCar portion of the film in a positive light, despite how brief it is (2 to 4 minutes, tops, in a roughly 1 hour, 45 minute film).

The two most recent, specific, live-action open-wheel racing-focused movies to hit the big screen are “Rush,” which came out in 2013 and “Driven,” which crashed into theaters in 2001. IndyCar also had its animated movie – “Turbo” – come out in 2013, which I won’t compare it to here because it isn’t a comparable example.

“Rush,” Ron Howard’s Hollywood version chronicling the 1976 Formula 1 title bout between James Hunt and Niki Lauda, was critically acclaimed, earned two Golden Globe nominations for best picture and Daniel Bruhl’s portrayal of Lauda.

“Driven”… the less said about it the better, other than to say it’s still the butt of jokes almost 15 years later.

Where “Focus” (something about racing being a part of one-word movie titles, it seems?) succeeds from a racing standpoint is that it makes racing – and in particular IndyCar racing – look cool.

Smith and Robbie have great chemistry throughout the film, even as it weaves through various twists and turns.

The South American team member Smith is dealing with gives off a vibe of arrogance, but the Australian individual he works with is depicted nicely – several Australians make up the IndyCar paddock and they’re some of the nicest (and quirkiest, in Will Power’s case) people you’ll run across at a race weekend.

The key, ultimately, is that while “Rush” and “Driven” were racing-focused films, “Focus” is meant for a wider audience. Smith is still a top flight star; Robbie’s star is clearly on the rise given her work here and in “The Wolf of Wall Street;” and in terms of a con man/action thriller with comedic moments sprinkled throughout, this is intended to draw in typical fans of that genre.

These are the kinds of things that expose IndyCar to a wider audience beyond the so-called “I-465 bubble” mentality, and the visibility is something that’s now there before the season gets going a month from now in St. Petersburg.

It’s good to see, and in a perfect world you’d like to see Smith or Robbie on the short list to be involved with the Indianapolis Motor Speedway later this year, perhaps driving the pace car.

If nothing else, it forces you to focus on IndyCar for the few moments it is on screen, when you’re not focusing on the cons going on the rest of the time.

Strong rebounds for Alex Palou, Chip Ganassi amid some disappointments in the Indy 500


INDIANAPOLIS – Alex Palou had not turned a wheel wrong the entire Month of May at the Indy 500 until Rinus VeeKay turned a wheel into the Chip Ganassi Racing pole-sitter leaving pit road on Lap 94.

“There is nothing I could have done there,” Palou told NBC Sports. “It’s OK, when it is my fault or the team’s fault because everybody makes mistakes. But when there is nothing, you could have done differently there, it feels bad and feels bad for the team.”

Marcus Ericsson was a master at utilizing the “Tail of the Dragon” move that breaks the draft of the car behind him in the closing laps to win last year’s Indianapolis 500. On Sunday, however, the last of three red flags in the final 16 laps of the race had the popular driver from Sweden breathing fire after Team Penske’s Josef Newgarden beat him at his own game on the final lap to win the Indianapolis 500.

Despite the two disappointments, team owner Chip Ganassi was seen on pit road fist-bumping a member on his four-car team in this year’s Indianapolis 500 after his drivers finished second, fourth, sixth and seventh in the tightly contested race.

Those are pretty good results, but at the Indianapolis 500, there is just one winner and 32 losers.

“There is only one winner, but it was a hell of a show,” three-time Indianapolis 500 winner and Chip Ganassi Racing consultant Dario Franchitti told NBC Sports. “Alex was very fast, and he got absolutely caught out in somebody else’s wreck. There was nothing he could have done, but he and the 10 car, great recovery.

“Great recovery by all four cars because at half distance, we were not looking very good.”

After 92 laps, the first caution flew for Sting Ray Robb of Dale Coyne Racing hitting the Turn 1 wall.

During pit stops on Lap 94, Palou had left his stall when the second-place car driven by VeeKay ran into him, putting Palou’s Honda into the wall. The car sustained a damaged front wing, but the Chip Ganassi crew was able to get him back in the race on the lead lap but in 28th position.

Palou ultimately would fight his way to a fourth-place finish in a race the popular Spaniard could have won. His displeasure with VeeKay, whom he sarcastically called “a legend” on his team radio after the incident, was evident.

“The benefit of being on pole is you can drive straight and avoid crashes, and he was able to crash us on the side on pit lane, which is pretty tough to do, but he managed it,” Palou told NBC Sports. “Hopefully next year we are not beside him. Hopefully, next year we have a little better luck.”

Palou started on the pole and led 36 laps, just three fewer than race leader Pato O’Ward of Arrow McLaren Racing.

“We started really well, was managing the fuel as we wanted, our car was pretty good,” Palou said. “Our car wasn’t great, we dropped to P4 or P5, but we still had some good stuff.

“On the pit stop, the 21 (VeeKay) managed to clip us. Nothing we could have done there. It was not my team’s fault or my fault.

“We had to drop to the end. I’m happy we made it back to P4. We needed 50 more laps to make it happen, but it could have been a lot worse after that contact.

“I learned a lot, running up front at the beginning and in mid-pack and then the back. I learned a lot.

“It feels amazing when you win it and not so good when things go wrong. We were a bit lucky with so many restarts at the end to make it back to P4 so I’m happy with that.”

Palou said the front wing had to be changed and the toe-in was a bit off, but he still had a fast car.

In fact, his Honda was the best car at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway all month. His pole-winning four lap average speed of 234.217 miles per hour around the 2.5-mile Indianapolis Motor Speedway was a record for this fabled race.

Palou looked good throughout the race, before he had to scratch and claw and race his way back to the top-five after he restarted 28th.

In the Indianapolis 500, however, the best car doesn’t always win.

“It’s two years in a row that we were leading the race at the beginning and had to drop to last,” Palou said. “Maybe next year, we will start in the middle of the field and go on to win the race.

“I know he didn’t do it on purpose. It’s better to let that pass someday.”

Palou said the wild racing at the end was because the downforce package used in Sunday’s race means the drivers have to be aggressive. The front two cars can battle for the victory, but cars back in fourth or fifth place can’t help determine the outcome of the race.

That is when the “Tail of the Dragon” comes into the play.

Franchitti helped celebrate Ericsson’s win in 2022 with his “Tail of the Dragon” zigzag move – something he never had to do in any of his three Indianapolis 500 victories because they all finished under caution.

In 2023, however, IndyCar Race Control wants to make every attempt to finish the race under green, without going past the scheduled distance like NASCAR’s overtime rule.

Instead of extra laps, they stop the race with a red flag, to create a potential green-flag finish condition.

“You do what you have to do to win within the rules, and it’s within the rules, so you do it,” Franchitti said. “The race is 200 laps and there is a balance.

“Marcus did a great job on that restart and so did Josef. It was just the timing of who was where and that was it.

“If you knew it was going to go red, you would have hung back on the lap before.

“Brilliant job by the whole Ganassi organization because it wasn’t looking very good at half-distance.

“Full marks to Josef Newgarden and Team Penske.”

Franchitti is highly impressed by how well Ericsson works with CGR engineer Brad Goldberg and how close this combination came to winning the Indianapolis 500 two-years-in-a-row.

It would have been the first back-to-back Indy 500 winner since Helio Castroneves in 2001 and 2002.

“Oh, he’s a badass,” Franchitti said Ericsson. “He proved it last year. He is so calm all day. What more do you need? As a driver, he’s fast and so calm.”

Ericsson is typically in good spirits and jovial.

He was stern and direct on pit road after the race.

“I did everything right, I did an awesome restart, caught Josef off-guard and pulled away,” Ericsson said on pit lane. “It’s hard to pull away a full lap and he got me back.

“I’m mostly disappointed with the way he ended. I don’t think it was fair and safe to do that restart straight out of the pits on cold tires for everyone.

“To me, it was not a good way to end that race.

“Congrats to Josef. He didn’t do anything wrong. He is a worthy champion, but it shouldn’t have ended like that.”

Palou also didn’t understand the last restart, which was a one-start showdown.

“I know that we want to finish under green,” Palou said. “Maybe the last restart I did, I didn’t understand. It didn’t benefit the CGR team.

“I’m not very supportive of the last one, but anyway.”

Dixon called the red flags “a bit sketchy.”

“The Red Flags have become a theme to the end of the race, but sometimes they can catch you out,” Dixon said. “I know Marcus is frustrated with it.

“All we ask for is consistency. I think they will do better next time.

“It’s a tough race. People will do anything they can to win it and with how these reds fall, you have to be in the right place at the right time. The problem is when they throw a Red or don’t throw a Red dictates how the race will end.

“It’s a bloody hard race to win. Congrats to Josef Newgarden and to Team Penske.”

Follow Bruce Martin on Twitter at @BruceMartin_500