Stefan Johansson’s latest blog entry looks back at last weekend’s Mexican Grand Prix, where controversy over officiating, track limits and penalties ruled the day and merited further analysis.
It’s the latest conversation with Jan Tegler live on Johansson’s website, and continues with what we’ve been chronicling throughout the year on NBCSports.com.
Excerpts from the blog are below, while a full read is recommended:
“I’ve been trying to arrive at an answer as to why the officiating of F1 has become such a mess all of a sudden. It’s certainly not the first time we’ve seen drivers duke it out with three or four laps to go. That’s the kind of close competition people want to see but this was compromised.
“The only punishment you can get now is what comes from the control tower rather than an immediate consequence for running off-track. Formula One needs to figure out how to reintroduce an immediate and natural punishment for going off-track.”
“At the end of this race time penalties were handed out. Whether what Verstappen did was right or wrong – personally, I think it was wrong but it’s not for me to decide – he should have been told to immediately give up his position to Vettel if he was judged to be wrong. In the end, instead he lost two places. He gave up a position to Vettel and then lost one to Ricciardo.
“This is not fair on Verstappen’s part as he lost one position more than he should have and gave an unfair benefit to Ricciardo who had nothing to do with the battle between Vettel and Verstappen but gained one position more than he should have thanks to the time penalty.
“There is no science behind these time penalties but just a random number picked out of the blue. Who says 5 seconds is the correct penalty, why not instead 10 seconds, or 3, they’re all completely random numbers and does not relate to the “crime” in any way.
“Assume for a moment that Verstappen was racing in NASCAR. He wouldn’t have finished one race this season. He would have been in the wall every single race if he had applied the same attitude he’s shown in F1 so far. The other drivers would have sorted him out in no time until he would have shown a mutual level of respect that the other competitors showed to him.”
“I don’t remember when this whole open-radio policy began where the public can hear conversations between the drivers and teams. I guess that’s part of the entertainment now but if you allow and promote that then you’re going to have to expect that drivers are going to show their frustration now and then. Why should that surprise anyone? At least you’re hearing a live, breathing human being showing real emotion instead of drivers thanking the team, sponsors, their parents, etc – all that stuff you normally hear on the slowing down lap has become almost meaningless.
“What Vettel said shows what’s actually going on in the car and I can relate to it 100 percent. Normally when you get on the radio like that, you just want to blow off some steam. Yes of course, you have to try to control yourself but I’ve certainly been guilty of using far worse language than Vettel did.”
Previous linkouts to Johansson’s blog on MotorSportsTalk are linked below:
- 10/28: On COTA, blocking, and more
- 9/29: On Rosberg’s ascendance, Pagenaud’s IndyCar title
- 9/15: On Dixon Watkins Glen domination, F1 after Liberty Media buyout of CVC
- 9/1: On Texas, Verstappen and blocking
- 7/30: On F1’s rule changes, Rosenqvist Indy debut
- 7/16: On IndyCar’s rise, F1 penalties
- 7/11: On Rosberg’s crazy week, and more
- 7/1: On Le Mans finish, F1 back-to-back in Canada, Baku
- 6/9: On Indy 500 and Monaco GP
- 5/26: On Verstappen, Mercedes and more
- 4/29: On rules, regs and female drivers
- 4/7: F1’s power struggle, Haas’ rise
- 3/24: Addressing fixes for F1, IndyCar
Additionally, a link to Johansson’s social media channels and #F1TOP3 competition are linked here.